Optimization of Effective Tax Rate Through the Interaction of Debt Policy and CSR with Managerial Ownership as a Mediator in the Metal and Mineral Industry Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange for the Period 2022-2024

Authors

  • Aldhita Triasmoro Rahardjo Universitas Widyagama Malang
  • Muchlis Mas’ud Universitas Widyagama Malang
  • Sodik Sodik Universitas Widyagama Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v5i2.758

Keywords:

CSR, Debt Policy, Effective Tax Rate, Legitimacy

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the optimization of the Effective Tax Rate (ETR) through the interaction of debt policy (Debt-to-Equity Ratio) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) spending, with managerial ownership as a mediator, focusing on 30 companies in the metal and mineral industry listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2022-2024 period. The research employs a quantitative approach using panel data regression with a Fixed Effect Model. In this study, optimal tax management is understood not as achieving the lowest tax rate, but as reaching an equilibrium point between tax efficiency and social responsibility to maintain long- term corporate legitimacy and value. The primary findings indicate that debt policy and CSR simultaneously exert a significant influence on ETR (p=0.0276). Likewise, in the mediation model, debt policy, CSR, and managerial ownership collectively show a significant simultaneous influence on ETR (p=0.0218). However, partially, each variable does not show a significant individual influence. This phenomenon is explained through the logic of Optimal Tax Rate Theory, where the ETR in the Indonesian mineral industry has reached a deterministic equilibrium heavily influenced by rigid regulations such as PP-96/2021 and PMK-169/2015. Consequently, marginal changes in individual managerial policies are not strong enough to shift the ETR independently, as the corporate tax position is primarily dictated by collective regulatory constraints and technical accounting factors.

References

Abdelfattah, T., & Aboud, A. (2020). Tax avoidance, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility: The case of the Egyptian capital market. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 38, 100304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100304

Agusta, M. (2025). The influence of institutional ownership, leverage, and profitability on tax avoidance: Empirical study on mining sector companies.

Arifbillah, K., Santoso, R. A., Yolanda, V., & Wijaya, S. (2023). Urgensi penerapan windfall profit tax atas komoditas batu bara di Indonesia. Educoretax, 3(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v3i1.374

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Beverinotti, J., Canavire-Bacarreza, G., Deza, M. C., & Gayoso De Ervin, L. (2021). The effects of management practices on effective tax rates: Evidence from Ecuador. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0003505

Bhattacharyya, A., & Imam, T. (2024). Mandated CSR spending and tax aggressiveness: A machine learning-driven analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 452, 142140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142140

Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2014). Fundamentals of financial management (8th ed.). Brooks/Cole.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

Chang, A., Meiryani, Sumarwan, U., Gunawan, T., Devi, S. R., Samukri, S., & Salim, G. (2023). The influence of debt-to-equity ratio, capital intensity ratio, and profitability on effective tax rate in the tourism sector. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 12(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i1art5

Chen, G., Mathers, A. M., Wang, B., & Wang, X. (2023). The impact of stakeholder orientation on tax avoidance: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 34(2), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22594

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Col, B., & Patel, S. (2019). Going to haven? Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1033–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3393-2

Dewantara, A. R. (2025). Interest limitation rules and corporate tax avoidance: A cross-country analysis. Scientax, 6(2), 178–200. https://doi.org/10.52869/st.v6i2.904

Ding, R., Cao, Y., & Sun, Y. (2022). The effects of mandatory CSR disclosure on tax avoidance and tax incidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 905153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905153

Direktorat Data dan Informasi. (2025, February 3). Data realisasi investasi triwulan IV tahun 2024. https://data.bkpm.go.id/dataset-detail/data-realisasi-investasi-triwulan-iv-tahun-2024-nKo1EyF

Disyon, H., Widianingsih, W., & Rio, F. (2022). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in SOE mining sector in Indonesia: Commitment of social-legal awareness. JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo), 6(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.21580/jsw.2022.6.2.12423

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887

Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226

Efenana, F. O., & Egbunike, P. A. (2023). Ownership structure and corporate tax aggressiveness of public listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Journal of Global Accounting, 5(1), 141–160.

Fernainy, P., Godard-Sebillotte, C., Lacasse, A., Layani, G., Longo, C., Kaczorowski, J., Rodriguez, M. A., Poitras, M.-E., Breton, M., Lussier, M.-T., Couturier, Y., Hudon, C., & Sourial, N. (2025). Causal mediation analysis: What is it and how can it be used to inform practice and policy? Family Practice, 42(4), cmaf043. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf043

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Fullerton, D. (1984). Which effective tax rate? National Tax Journal, 37(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41791931

Gillette, D. B., & Stinson, S. R. (2022). Who gets to play dirty? Using legitimacy theory to examine investor reactions to differing modes of corporate tax minimization. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(4), 2596–2621. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12805

Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510146996

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Aldhita Triasmoro Rahardjo, Muchlis Mas’ud, & Sodik Sodik. (2026). Optimization of Effective Tax Rate Through the Interaction of Debt Policy and CSR with Managerial Ownership as a Mediator in the Metal and Mineral Industry Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange for the Period 2022-2024. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 5(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v5i2.758

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.