The Influence Independent Commissioner, Audit Committee, Sustainability Reporting And Political ConnectionsOn Tax Avoidance
Case Study of Properties & Real Estate Sector Companies On 2021-2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v4i1.307Keywords:
Audit Committee, Avoidance tax, Commissioner Independent, Connection Political, Reporting SustainabilityAbstract
Study This aiming For analyze influence commissioner independent , audit committee , reporting sustainability , and connection political to avoidance tax on company sector property and real estate listed on the IDX for the 2021-2023 period . The method used is panel data regression with a total sample of 51 observations . Results test regression show that audit committee (B 0.022; p 0.038) and connection politics (B 0.043; p=0.048) has an effect significant to avoidance tax , while commissioner independent (p=0.991) and reporting sustainability (p = 0.898) no influential significant . Conclusion show that effectiveness audit committee presses avoidance tax , while connection political precisely push it . Implications from study This highlight importance strengthening internal audit function and management connection ethical politics use increase transparency And compliance taxation company
References
[1] A. Tirtakusuma and R. G. M., “Sustainability Reporting dan Kewajiban Pajak: Peran Standar GRI dan SASB Pada Perusahaan Indonesia Melalui Pendekatan Literatur Review,” vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 951–960, 2025.
[2] I. A. Aditya and Hafid, “Praktek Pelaporan Keberlanjutan Di Indonesia: Sebuah Telaah Kritis Atas Literatur Terdahulu,” JEMAP, vol. 7, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.24167/jemap.v7i1.10947
[3] E. Agustina and B. S. Putri, “Praktik Pelaporan Keberlanjutan Pada Perusahaan,” RAJ, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 493–499, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://journal.yrpipku.com/index.php/raj
[4] I. S. Ahmadi and A. Rahman, “Pengaruh Faktor Keuangan Dan Non Keuangan Terhadap Tindakan Penghindaran Pajak,” NCAF, vol. 2, pp. 86–97, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.20885/ncaf.vol2.art8
[5] F. Amaliyah and E. Herwiyanti, “Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Dewan Komisaris Independen, Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan,” Jurnal Akuntansi, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 187–200, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.9.3.187-200
[6] A. Amanda Wulansari and H. T. Pohan, “Pengaruh Economic Disclosure Pada Sustainability Report Dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak,” Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 511–520, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.25105/v4i2.20840
[7] A. R. Daffa and E. Herwiyanti, “Tinjauan Literatur Prinsip Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara Indonesia,” Economics and Digital Business Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 217–230, 2023.
[8] D. P. Aji, A. H. Arrasyid, and A. B., “Peran Dan Efektivitas Komite Audit Dalam Pengawasan Keuangan Perusahaan,” NJMS, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 624–633, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.intekom.id/index.php/njms
[9] E. W. H. Budianto and N. D. T. D., “Pemetaan Topik Penelitian Seputar CSR Pada Perbankan Syariah Dan Konvensional: Studi Bibliometrik,” 2022.
[10] F. R. Ngabdillah, B. C. Pratama, N. Dirgantari, and H. W., “Pengaruh Koneksi Politik, Komisaris Independen, Kualitas Audit, dan Komite Audit Terhadap Tax Avoidance,” vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2022.
[11] Y. Fitiasari and S. S. Suwandi, “Peran Koneksi Politik Memperkuat Hubungan Profitabilitas Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak,” JIATAX, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 17, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.30587/jiatax.v3i1.986
[12] E. O. D. Gozali, R. S. Hamzah, and C. N. Pratiwi, “Peran Good Corporate Governance terhadap Kinerja Perbankan,” Nominal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 122–140, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v11i1.43908
[13] T. Harahap and R. A. Ritonga, “Peran Good Corporate Governance Dalam Meningkatkan Transparansi Laporan Keuangan,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 353–360, 2024.
[14] R. Y. Hardiono, F. R. Mahendra, M. I. Paleva, and I. N. Noor, “Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan, Pelaporan Keberlanjutan, Dan Koneksi Politik Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak,” JSA, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 2873–2886, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i8.1409
[15] Hasan, *Dasar-dasar Manajemen Keuangan*, Yogyakarta, 2015.
[16] I. Siahaan, R. A. S. Surya, and A. Z., “Pengaruh Opini Audit, Pergantian Auditor, Kesulitan Keuangan, Dan Efektivitas Komite Audit Terhadap Audit Delay,” vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 135–144, 2019.
[17] K. Julian and T. Zega, “Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik Sebagai Mitigasi Risiko Manajemen Kinerja Organisasi,” pp. 117–130, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33541/mr.v3i2.5050
[18] N. Khomsiyah, N. Muttaqiin, and P. Katias, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Tata Kelola Perusahaan, Leverage, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Pertumbuhan Penjualan Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak,” Ecopreneur.12, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.51804/econ12.v4i1.917
[19] L. P. Maidina and L. N. W., “Pengaruh Koneksi Politik, Good Corporate Governance Dan Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Tax Avoidance,” vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 118–131, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.stiemj.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi
[20] L. Maulina and S. Mu’arif, “Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Karakter Eksekutif Dan Koneksi Politik Terhadap Tax Avoidance,” Laras, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 01–13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.61722/jemba.v1i4.436
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Economics and Management Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
